rtificial Intelligence is reshaping cybersecurity at unprecedented speed. While organisations are embracing AI to improve efficiency, automate operations and accelerate innovation, cybercriminals are exploiting the same technologies to launch more sophisticated attacks, automate reconnaissance, generate convincing phishing campaigns and identify vulnerabilities faster than ever before. As a result, the challenge facing security leaders is no longer simply how to defend against cyberattacks, but how to build organisations capable of withstanding and recovering from them.

Meeting that challenge requires a fundamental shift in thinking. Cyber-resilience is becoming just as important as prevention, with organisations placing greater emphasis on trusted recovery, resilient architectures, intelligent vulnerability management and the secure adoption of AI itself. Rather than viewing AI solely as another technology to deploy, security leaders are increasingly considering how it can strengthen defence while ensuring it does not introduce unacceptable levels of risk.

In this feature, three experts share their perspectives on how organisations can build cyberresilience in the AI era, offering practical advice on trusted recovery, secure AI architectures and the intelligent prioritisation of cyber-risk.

Cybersecurity leaders are increasingly rethinking resilience strategies as Artificial Intelligence transforms both the speed and sophistication of cyberattacks and cyberdefence. Fraser Hutchison, Vice President and Managing Director – UK & Ireland at Cohesity; Kris Voorspoels, Director of Products & Solutions at OPSWAT; and Shailesh Athalye, Senior Vice President, Product Management at Qualys, explain how organisations can strengthen cyber-resilience through trusted recovery, secure AI architectures and AI-driven vulnerability management.

Fraser Hutchison,

Vice President and Managing Director – UK & Ireland, Cohesity

Building cyberresilience through an AI-powered Minimum Viable Company

AI is changing the economics of cyber-risk. Attackers are using it to automate reconnaissance, create more convincing social engineering, accelerate vulnerability discovery and adapt campaigns at machine speed. Defenders should also use it to improve detection, prioritise alerts, investigate incidents and speed up responses. The outcome is not dictated simply by a technology race. It is a resilience contest.

WWW. INTELLIGENTCISO. COM 37